Popular Nigerian media personality and controversial figure, VeryDarkMan (VDM), has once again taken to social media to express his frustration over what he describes as unjust treatment by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). In a passionate Instagram post, he pleaded with the agency to either charge him in court or return his confiscated phones.
According to VDM, his ordeal began on May 2nd, when he was allegedly detained by the EFCC without clear charges or formal communication of his offence. “Till tomorrow, you haven’t said what I did,” he wrote, directing his statement at the anti-graft agency’s official handle.
He further disclosed that his phones — tools essential to his work and outreach — remain in the custody of the EFCC. VDM explained that the confiscation has hindered his ability to continue meaningful conversations and business engagements, particularly those aimed at empowering Nigerian youths.
“I went to China, made connections with manufacturers and CEOs. It cost me time and money,” he lamented, pointing out that his trip was part of a larger effort to create business opportunities for young Nigerians through importation and digital education.
The social commentator claimed that the continued withholding of his devices has not only limited his freedom but has also stalled projects that could benefit hundreds of aspiring entrepreneurs. “You’re restricting me from helping people,” he said bluntly.
This isn’t the first time VDM has had run-ins with authorities. Known for his blunt, no-holds-barred social media presence, VDM has often criticized institutions and public figures, earning both praise and backlash. However, this time, he insists the matter is bigger than personal — it’s about justice and national progress.
Nigerians have reacted to his post with mixed emotions. While some sympathize and demand accountability from the EFCC, others suggest that VDM’s controversial style may have contributed to his legal troubles.
Legal analysts have also weighed in, stating that prolonged detention without charge or access to property may violate constitutional rights. “If he hasn’t been charged and there's no warrant explaining the seizure, the EFCC may have questions to answer,” a legal expert commented anonymously.
As the public awaits an official statement from the EFCC, the spotlight remains on whether VDM will finally get his day in court — or his phones back. Either way, the case raises questions about due process, digital rights, and the growing power of social media influencers in Nigeria's civic space.
0 Comments